Researchers Complete Ginkgo Review 
        A recent review of the scientific literature on ginkgo leaf (Ginkgo 
                biloba L., Ginkgoaceae), one of the best researched herbs, 
                yielded evidence in favor of the plant's clinical use in dementia 
                (Ernst and Pittler, 1999). In compiling their review, the research 
                team used the most stringent inclusion criteria, selecting only 
                clinical studies that were randomized, double-blind, and placebo-controlled. 
                Although the authors had initially planned to perform a meta-analysis, 
                data from the studies proved to be too heterogeneous for statistical 
                pooling.  
               	Out of nine studies that met inclusion criteria, the 1997 
                American study published in the Journal of the American Medical 
                Association (LeBars et al., 1997) was the most impressive. 
                The trial included a large sample size of 327 patients, although 
                only 137 completed the study. It also employed a relatively long 
                treatment period of one year, exceeding the duration of treatment 
                utilized in many pharmaceutical drug studies on dementia. Overall, 
                Alzheimer's disease patients seemed to benefit more from ginkgo 
                therapy than did those with multi-infarct dementia, a decline 
                in brain function caused by multiple strokes. Researchers found 
                no difference in effectiveness based on age or severity of symptoms 
                at baseline. However, on the global rating of clinical symptoms, 
                the clinicians were unable to detect significant differences between 
                ginkgo and placebo. A six-month study of 156 participants supported 
                the results of the JAMA study (Kanowski et al, 1996). The 
                current review also included seven studies ranging in length from 
                four to 12 weeks, most of which demonstrated ginkgo's superiority 
                to placebo. 
              Although encouraging, the review also revealed many limitations 
                and methodological flaws. Only four studies out of nine scored 
                the maximum five points on the Jadad scale, which assesses methodological 
                quality. In the other five studies, inclusion and exclusion criteria 
                varied widely, creating the possibility that participants without 
                dementia-related conditions may have been included. Similarly, 
                the earlier studies were conducted before consistent outcome measures 
                for dementia were available, making it difficult to compare study 
                results. Although all of the trials were randomized, few authors 
                provided precise details on the randomization procedure they used. 
                In terms of dosage, the amount of ginkgo taken in the active therapy 
                groups ranged from 120 mg to 240 mg daily, and none of the studies 
                attempted to define an optimal treatment regimen. Because ginkgo 
                manufacturers sponsored the research, there is also a possibility 
                of a bias towards publishing positive findings and ignoring negative 
                ones. (This potential problem of publication bias applies to conventional 
                drug research as well.) Finally, the authors pointed out that 
                many of the studies were too short in duration to "yield 
                ultimately compelling results." Likewise, the research showed 
                that ginkgo improved symptoms of dementia, but there is no solid 
                evidence confirming its role in actually delaying clinical deterioration. 
               
              Although "none of the current studies is flawless and ultimately 
                convincing," Ernst and Pittler concluded that there is compelling 
                evidence in favor of ginkgo's use in dementia. In addition, there 
                is a body of 40 controlled studies on cerebral vascular insufficiency 
                that indirectly supports ginkgo's use in dementia. Although not 
                well defined, vascular insufficiency shares some of the same symptoms 
                as dementia, such as impaired memory and poor concentration. According 
                to research, the incidence of side effects with ginkgo was not 
                measurably different than with placebo. A large postmarketing 
                surveillance study involving 10,815 people demonstrated mild side 
                effects in just 1.7 percent of participants. Nevertheless, future 
                research is needed "to establish the clinical value of ginkgo 
                for dementia and to answer the multitude of open questions which 
                remain." -  Krista Morien, 
                HRF 
              
            
               
               
              [Ernst E, Pittler MH. Ginkgo biloba for dementia: a systematic 
                review of double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Clinical 
                Drug Investigations 1999; 17(4): 301-308. 
                
                
               
               
              Kanowski S, Herrmann WM, Stephan K, Wierich W, Hörr R. Proof 
                of efficacy of the Ginkgo biloba extract Egb 761 in outpatients 
                suffering from mild to moderate primary degenerative demetia of 
                the Alzheimer type or multi-infarct demetia. Phytomedicine 
                1997; 4(1): 3-13. 
                
                
               
               
              Le Bars PL, Katz MM, Berman N, Itil TM, Freedman AM, Schatzberg 
                AF. A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of an 
                extract of Ginkgo biloba for dementia. JAMA 1997; 
                278: 1327-1332.] 
               |